Annual Indian wine ratings 2008
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09325/093259740402628acedb254d0bf92be9bf7cb9a8" alt=""
Just 10 years ago, Indian wines were a bad joke. They were not as bad as a Bosca or a Golconda that many of us cut our teeth on, but they didn’t show much promise.
No one then could have imagined the proliferation of the Indian wine industry, sparked by a nondescript official document titled Maharashtra Grape Processing Policy, 2001.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ed0b3/ed0b3b4e7b2ce7ffe54300c38355719cb38df419" alt="The panel The panel"
Today, the consumer has an array of choices and it is evident from a visit to a wine shop. You will find the wine counters reasonably stocked with Indian brands.
Go to any party, and you’ll find an Indian wine being served. But with choice comes confusion. The average consumer doesn’t really know which wine to trust and is unaware of the good, bad and ugly wines entering the market. The BT More Indian Wine Ratings, which will be an annual affair, is the first step towards making wine buying a matter of more informed choice.
Before we end the suspense and declare the results, here’s how we went about things. First we put together a panel of judges at short notice, so that their names did not get out into the public domain.
We also approached Shangri-La Hotel in New Delhi to host the event for two good reasons: it is doing some innovative things with wine, making wines by the glass both accessible and affordable; and its General Manager Andrew Steele is a well-travelled wine connoisseur.
Our expert panel
|
We did it in style: A wine rating, like Caesar’s wife, must be above suspicion.
1. We did what hasn’t been done in any wine rating exercise. We did not charge any entrance fee from any participating company.
2. We also kept the names of the panel members a secret.
3. The participating companies were approached by the BT More editorial staff, who were not involved in any way in the judging process.
What we discovered: Indian wines have a long distance to travel before they can cross the 15-point barrier on the UC-Davis scale and become eligible for comparisons with their international peers. The BT More Indian Wine Ratings is the earliest sign of the consumer waking up to the immense potential of Indian wine. It is now up to Indian wine companies to reciprocate and keep working at climbing the quality ladder.
How we judged the wines: We rated the 38 wines according to the 20-point method developed at the University of California at Davis. Under this system, we assigned Appearance 4 points (2 each for colour and clarity), Aroma 6 points, Taste 8 points and Overall Impression 2 points. Needless to say, none of the judges knew which wines they were tasting.
Appearance: How your eyes perceive the wine before tasting.
Aroma: What your nose tells you about the wine after you swirl it.
Taste: A complex interaction of mouth feel, taste (sweet, sour and acid) and aroma (smells that travel up the back of the throat to the nose). Complex tastes and those that linger are associated with good wines.
Overall impression: This is the subjective bit. You can rate a wine on this parameter only by asking yourself whether you’d like to pay for it.